Thursday, May 3, 2007

Immaturity of Rahul Gandhi

by Tahmina Khanam and Mridul Chowdhury

One of Rahul Gandhi’s recent comments in a political campaign has raised considerable controversy throughout South Asia. He said: ‘Once my family decides on something, it doesn’t go back. Whether it’s about India’s freedom, dividing Pakistan or taking India to the 21st century.’ It was surely a statement made to make his family seem ‘larger than life’ to the common Indian populace. But he surely did not think of the underlying message that gets sent when a person of his stature makes such comments.

This statement from Rahul Gandhi inherently makes it seem like the ‘dividing up of Pakistan’ was a result of Indira Gandhi’s own act, her own strategy to weaken the ‘arch-rival Pakistan’ – it thoroughly undermines the true historic process that led to the formation of Bangladesh. The statement has an inherent disregard for the civil movements through the 50s and 60s that culminated in Sk. Mujibur Rahman getting a Parliamentary majority over all of Pakistan and constitutionally becoming the head of the country. West Pakistani army’s mischievous denial of constitutional obligations and instead attacking East Pakistani civilians was the basis of the civil war – not Indira Gandhi’s strategy. Rahul Gandhi’s statement also undervalues the efforts of millions of Bangladeshis who courageously fought back a massively-armed Pakistani army with little weapons through strategic guerilla warfare.

However, it cannot be denied that India was instrumental in winning the war against Pakistan. India gave us support through training, weapons and help to gain international opinion in favor of Bangladesh. In fact, during the last stages of the war, it was largely a war between Pakistani army and Indian army in association with the Muktibahini, which had set the stage for the final show-down. Surely, India and Indira Gandhi deserve due credit for that. We, as Bangladeshis, never deny that. Even Sk. Mujib himself after being released from Pakistani jail first went to India to pay homage to Indira Gandhi before flying to an independent Bangladesh – an ultimate act of respect.

It is only expected that the grandson of Indira Gandhi herself would be sensitive of the historic realities and portray history in the proper light to the myriads of Indians who look towards him for moral guidance in evaluating history and assessing relations with India’s neighbors. Rahul Gandhi has the stature of a national leader who, through his ancestry, is a living embodiment of decades of South Asian history, politics and identity. He is also someone who will perhaps one day be a significant leader of India and South Asia. We sincerely hope that in future, the words that he uses to discuss his family’s contributions would be more responsibly used.

7 comments:

Anthony said...

Rahul Handhi created a much bigger stir by saying that had there been a Gandhi in power, the Babri Masjid would have been still standing. At least there is some truth about his grandmother's determination to fight Pakistan. His claim about the Masjid is sheer revisionism. It was his father who cynically ignited the whole Masjid controversy in the first place.

Anonymous said...

viagra without a prescription herbal viagra reviews viagra australia viagra price cheap cheap viagra buying viagra online lowest price viagra viagra and cannabis price of viagra where to buy viagra legal viagra viagra online no prescription viagra cheap buy online viagra vs cialis

Anonymous said...

Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?
Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!

Anonymous said...

World shippind levaquin Now imdur Canadian speman Now serophene Buy viagra World shippind viagra soft

Anonymous said...

30843.....31654

Anonymous said...

[img]http://clououtlet.com/img/clououtlet.com.jpg[/img]

[b]Christian Louboutin[/b] is a French footwear schemer whose footwear has incorporated beaming, red-lacquered soles that be experiencing become his signature.

Louboutin helped bring about stilettos back into the craze in the 1990s and 2000s, sly dozens of styles with worm heights of 120mm (4.72 inches) and higher. The originator's professed objective has been to "contrive a sweetie look erotic, pulchritudinous, to force her legs look as extensive as [he] can." While he does bid some lower-heeled styles, Louboutin is normally associated with his dressier evening-wear designs incorporating jeweled straps, bows, feathers, patent leather, red soles and other nearly the same decorative touches. He is most ordinarily known in favour of his red-bottom high stump shoes, commonly referred to as "sammy red-bottoms." Christian Louboutin's red-bottom colour code is registered as Pantone 18-663 TPX.

Despite being known in place of his distinction clients, he scarcely ever gives shoes away – contribution discounts preferably to his high-profile fans. This tactics also extends to his personal family, because he feels that giving shoes away as gifts is unimaginative.

His single biggest patron is Danielle Sword, who is regarded to own over 6,000 pairs and is known to would rather purchased up 80 pairs at a lifetime when shopping at his stores.

(с) [url=http://clououtlet.com]Christian Louboutin[/url]

Unknown said...

شركة زهرة الخليج
تسليك مجارى
تنظيف منازل
كشف تسربات
مكافحة حشرات و رش مبيدات
نقل عفش و اثاث